Sep
26
They Say it’s “Not A Subsidy”
September 26, 2008 | | Leave a Comment
THEY SAY IT’S NOT A SUBSIDY: It is. When you give millions of dollars to one group, it IS a “subsidy.” It is also a TAX. When you take that money away from taxpayers to give it to other people, it IS a TAX. They’re both right. It IS a multi-million dollar TAX because where do you think the oil companies are going to get “replacement money” when they no longer have that subsidy? From you and me. I don’t think the government should subsidize ANY private business. But that’s just me. . . . “REACHING ACROSS THE AISLE”: The Democrats are always criticizing Republicans for “not reaching across the aisle” to Democrats. Why should they? There’s nothing Republicans WANT over there. To “reach across the aisle” they would have to compromise their principles and do what the DEMOCRATS want. . . . PARTISAN BICKERING: That’s what Democrats call the debate in Congress, and want to eliminate it. That’s “code” for “shutting up Republicans.” If we need to get rid of “partisan bickering,” why then, do we have two parties? . . . SARAH “EVITA” PALIN: Naomi Wolfe referred to Sarah Palin as “Sarah “Evita” Palin in a post to Huffington Post saying she will head a “police state” if elected. How ridiculous! Evita wanted to impose a SOCIALIST state on Argentina and destroyed that country’s economy in the attempt before her timely death. How Wolfe could compare Sarah to a SOCIALIST is beyond me. But I personally think she is insane, and she has proved it with this post. I have compared Hillary to Evita, but with good reason. Hillary wants to succeed her husband as president (as Evita did) while pushing SOCIALISM (as Evita did). . . . MOST CORRUPT: A local political ad says Colorado politician Marilyn Musgrave has been named “the most corrupt politician.” Sounds bad for her and good for her opponent, doesn’t it? Ask who NAMED her that. It will turn out to be her opponent or his/her friends. This is a good example of “asinine politics.” . . . “OBAMA: TERRORIST’S BEST FRIEND”: That’s what it said on a t-shirt worn by a teenager in school–for which he earned a suspension by his own choice. They told him to either change the shirt, turn it inside-out, or take a suspension. He chose the suspension, to the surprise of “authorities,” who thought he’d choose one of the other options. His father is planning a suit for violation of his son’s First Amendment rights.