Dec
28
“Civility and “Bipartisanship”
December 28, 2008 | | Leave a Comment
“CIVILITY” AND “BIPARTISANSHIP”: The liberals talk about “civility” and “bipartisanship,” yet they’re the most UNcivil and the most partisan out there. Gay activists don’t like California voters passing an initiative banning gay marriage, so they promise rioting and do everything they can to overturn it. Yes, SOME gays are conservative. But most gay ACTIVISTS are liberal. They talk about “crossing the aisle,” but they mean the REPUBLICANS should “cross the aisle” and agree with THEIR position—and scream to high heavens when they don’t.
“PROCESSING AND HANDLING”: How stupid do they think we are? “Processing and handling” is the same thing. It is just an extra fee added onto what they’re selling. If it was “POSTAGE and handling,” I could understand it. But they’re just going too far, as usual. They must have noticed that most people don’t pay attention
IGNORING THE BAD PARTS: CNN did a story recently about the “orphan trains” in the last century designed to “find homes” for unwanted orphans. Makes you want to cry, doesn’t it? And I’ll bet some orphans found some “happy homes,” too. Unfortunately, that wasn’t the whole story. The completely ignored the fact that way too many children were adopted just so they could be unpaid farm workers or sex partners for pedophiles. I’m sure they thought they had taken care of that, but they didn’t. Today, more kids are “orphaned” by being forcibly removed from their homes AS A FIRST OPTION by the “child protectors, sometimes with NO child abuse being proven.
GORE THINKS WE’RE STUPID: He says the extreme cold temperatures are IRREFUTABLE PROOF of man-made global warming. I fail to understand his faulty reasoning and phony “science.”
HILLARY WANTS MORE POWER: Obama may regret his decision to appoint Hillary to be Secretary of State. She isn’t even in office yet and she wants a bigger budget and more power. It’s all about power, folks.
LIBERAL CONTRADICTIONS: Liberalism is FULL of contradictions; like taking money away from “the rich,” who are the very people whose investments (when they have money) FUEL this economy; and the whole idea that to DEFEND ourselves, we must DISARM ourselves and leave ourselves as “easy targets.”